Register close

glossy green tick

Be the first to know Scotland's latest rural news. Register Now for our FREE Rural Update service.

Register Now
Register Later
Existing members login now


Information News

Health appointments: who should get you there (and back) and who should pay?

The Scottish Ambulance Service (SAS) is proposing to withdraw Non-Emergency Patient Transport from somewhere between 18 and 30% of all users. They claim that this percentage is being booked due to social or geographic, not 'medical need'.

These people are often living in isolated rural communities where at best any bus service is infrequent. They are often elderly and unable to drive. Many are frail and suffer from some sort of disability. How are these people to access healthcare?

Community Transport bus in PerthshireThe SAS would like to see the voluntary sector picking much of this workload but there is no money on the table to do this and what seems not to be understood is that voluntary services are not free. Many Community Transport operators are already taking people to access healthcare, subsidising this from other funding and it cannot continue.

The Scottish Executive consultation paper 'Draft Guidance on Regional Transport Strategies states that one of its objectives is to "facilitate access to hospitals, clinics, surgeries and other places where a health service is provided".- placing the 'duty' for provision on local authorities.

But who is going to pay?

Voluntary Sector Community Transport Schemes are well placed to serve these clients if SAS will not/cannot do so. However we need pound notes on the table to do the job as vehicles and fuel are not free. Drivers also need to be in paid posts as what is required is a guaranteed service at a specific time, often on a regular basis. Drivers also need to be trained to deal with clients who may be taken ill en-route. It will happen. These people are sufficiently sick to need a health appointment so by definition they are not wholly well.

If the logic of the above is followed, as I believe it must be, the statement in the consultation paper "health boards and public bodies who provide, generate demand or otherwise impact on transport in the region...can be represented on the partnership as members or observers" needs to be amended to include voluntary sector Community Transport providers. We need a seat at the table now to ensure that the needs of rural, isolated people are met.

This consultation also needs to link with the issue of concessionary transport for older people. It is essential that the elderly can get concession fares on Community Transport as well as on public transport as there is often little available and what exists is not fully accessible.

Source
Rural Gateway Correspondent
Date
28-Nov-2005
Categories
All Scotland, News - General, Communities Links - Voluntary sector organisations, Health/Caring Links - Disability, Health/Caring Links - Elderly, Health/Caring Links - Health Organisations, Local Services Links - Transport
Story read 8997 times

User Comments: 1

heatlh Care inaccessible

18-Jul-2008 @ 18:43PM

Elizabeth Perrott

The closure or downgrading of regional hospitals in favour or large centres of excellence is severly discriminating against those who live in rural areas.

I have cancer and already do 150 mile round trip to the Royal Dumfries Hospital, which costs £30 in fuel not to mention being a very tiring journey.

I have been told that if I need either chemotherapy or radium treatment, this has now all been moved to Edinburgh, which is a 300 mile round trip. I may be required to go daily for up to three weeks.

The only help available is two changes of mini bus and even that necessitates me getting to Stranraer by 7am ( no public transport to get me there). I would probably die of exhaustion before the cancer killed me.

Some local cancer patients have had to stop their treatment or curtail the frequency, and the only other alternative would be to stay in Edinburgh for three weeks if they can find space in a hostel there, but only on your own. If you wanted a friend or relative with you, they would have to bear the cost of a B+B.
Surely provision, both financial and practical needs to be put in place to ensure cancer patients and others with serious health problems requiring ongoing treatment, are not excluded from health care?